Search
Question: Nested design in DESeq2
0
gravatar for Silva
2.5 years ago by
Silva0
Finland
Silva0 wrote:

Hi,

in my data, I have two groups: a treatment group and a control group. Both groups have two biological replicates (i.e., two replicated populations): "1" and "2". I would like to nest the replicates within the main groups OR set the replicates as a random effect when running the DESeq2. I am not particularly interested in differences between the replicates (we would like to assume that there are none) but I have to take replicate into account in the model. However, I don't know how to run a model with a random effect in it and I just set the group and replicate as main effects. When doing that, can I simply have two columns in my design: one for treatment ("treated","control") and one for replicate ("1","2")? Can I be sure then that in my model (counts ~ replicate + treatment) the replicates are nested within the treatment? Or should I code my replicates as "1", "2", "3", "4" ("1" and "2" within "treated" and "3" and "4" within "control")?

This is probably a silly question but I would really like to be sure that my design is correct.

ADD COMMENTlink modified 2.5 years ago by Michael Love15k • written 2.5 years ago by Silva0
3
gravatar for Michael Love
2.5 years ago by
Michael Love15k
United States
Michael Love15k wrote:

DESeq2 only allows for fixed effects. Because you are interested in comparing *across* replicates, you can't simultaneously fit the replicate and condition effects (e.g., the treatment effect is collinear with replicate 3 + 4). Your choices are then: (i) you can assume that the treatment effect is (rep3+rep4)/2 - (rep1+rep2)/2, which seems reasonable, or (ii) you can just fit the condition effect (where variance across replicates within condition will increase the dispersion estimates).

For (i) you would use a design of ~replicate and then:

results(dds, contrast=list(c("replicate3","replicate4"),c("replicate1","replicate2")), listValues=c(0.5, -0.5))

Also, I point out when people have experimental designs like this that with limma you can inform the model of correlations among samples (e.g. samples from replicate 1 are correlated) but without including a fixed effect in the model. See the duplicateCorrelation function in the limma package.

ADD COMMENTlink written 2.5 years ago by Michael Love15k
Please log in to add an answer.

Help
Access

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 2.2.0
Traffic: 122 users visited in the last hour