Question: Question: Deconvolution Methods on RNA-Seq Data (Mixed cell types)
gravatar for Pauly Lin
3.0 years ago by
Pauly Lin80
University of New South Wales, Australia
Pauly Lin80 wrote:

Dear all, 

I want to use deconvolution methods to estimate the proportions of different cell types in my RNA-Seq samples. In this post ( ), it's mentioned that "signals from different cell-types/tissues will sum more linearly in microarrays than RNAseq, where the sum is highly non-linear" and  "Any paper talking about signal separation will likely mention that the signals need to be independent for optimal performance, which they self-evidently aren't in RNAseq." Could someone please explain to me why in RNA-Seq samples the signals from different cell-types/tissues are not independent, or why the signals don't sum linearly?

Also, if I do decide to go ahead with using deconvolution methods, should I apply the deconvolution methods to raw RNA-Seq counts, log(CPM) transformed data, or voom transformed data?



ADD COMMENTlink modified 3.0 years ago by Steve Lianoglou12k • written 3.0 years ago by Pauly Lin80
gravatar for Steve Lianoglou
3.0 years ago by
Steve Lianoglou12k wrote:

Don't have thorough answers for you yet, but I did poke Devon over at Biostars to clarify the "self-evident" nature of that statement.

A few other notes:

ADD COMMENTlink modified 3.0 years ago • written 3.0 years ago by Steve Lianoglou12k
Please log in to add an answer.


Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 2.2.0
Traffic: 411 users visited in the last hour