Question: Bach effect and PEER/RUV correction on large population
0
gravatar for carleshf
2.7 years ago by
carleshf10
Spain/Barcelona/ISGlobal
carleshf10 wrote:

Dear all,

 

We are working with a large population with more than 1200 samples. From those samples, we got both gene expression and methylation data using Affymetrix HTA 2.0 and Illumina 450k. Both data were pre-processed using Affymetrix Expresion Control (GCCN-SST-RMA normalization pipeline) and minfi (functional normalization).

After the QC on gene expression we detected a strong batch effect on gene expression data. No batch effect was detected on methylation at this step. After some test on data analysis, the gene expression batch effect can be solved adjusting the models with some technical variables. We discovered that methylation data also has some kind of batch effect.

Hence, we tried to adjust methylation models using SVA. But it took more than three days to create 61 surrogate variables. Once the model was adjusted by these 61 surrogate variables, the results were acceptable.

The questions are:

  1. Is there a way to speed up SVA? We need to test more than 100 models.
  2. We are considering to use PEER/RUV. Do you recommend us to use them on methylation data?

 

Kind regards,

C.

ADD COMMENTlink modified 2.7 years ago • written 2.7 years ago by carleshf10
Please log in to add an answer.

Help
Access

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 16.09
Traffic: 103 users visited in the last hour