Correct DESeq2 design for tumoral stage differences in tumoral and matched-normal samples
1
0
Entering edit mode
Matteo • 0
@11faccfa
Last seen 9 months ago
Italy

Hi all, I am using DESeq2 for a DE analysis from RNASeq data. I am not sure I am using the correct formula in DESeq2 for the analysis.\ I have 100 tumor samples and 100 normal-matched.\ The tumor samples can be subgrouped according their tumoral stage (I, II, III and IV). I am running DESeq assigning "N" as tumoral stage variable for all normal samples and then running the following design:

dds <- DESeqDataSetFromTximport(txi, sampleTable, ~Patient_ID+Stage)

After that I extract results for the group comparisons

res <- results(dds, alpha=0.05, lfcThreshold = 0.58, contrast=c("Stage","I","II"))

I ignore comparisons against normals because I am interested in the differences between tumors from stages (but also keeping into account the inter-individual correction given by the presence of normal-matched samples).

Am I doing right?\ Thanks\ Matteo

DifferentialExpression RNASeq DESeq2 • 675 views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
ATpoint ★ 4.1k
@atpoint-13662
Last seen 16 hours ago
Germany

It's one way of doing it, yes. The vignette is a good place to start, but for hands-on guidance on your exact analysis you might seek a local collaboration as this is not what the support site is for.

ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

Thank you ATpoint

ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 464 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6