DEseq2 time-series design
3
1
Entering edit mode
@syednajeebashraf-19986
Last seen 15 days ago
Qatar

Hi All,

I have time series study, where colData files look like

      cellLine   dex timeStep batch
      200142521     TF-1  CTRL       24     A
      200142571     TF-1 IFN-g       24     A
      200142621     TF-1  CTRL       48     A
      200142661     TF-1 IFN-g       48     A
      200142701     TF-1  CTRL       72     A
      200142741     TF-1 IFN-g       72     A
      700347671     TF-1  CTRL       24     B
      700347681     TF-1 IFN-g       24     B
      700347691     TF-1  CTRL       48     B
      700347701     TF-1 IFN-g       48     B
      700347711     TF-1  CTRL       72     B
      700347721     TF-1 IFN-g       72     B

The aim of the study is to find Significantly differential Expression gene across Time series 24, 48 and 72 hours. I have two replicates for each Time steps.

I have used below design for analysis. dds <- DESeqDataSetFromMatrix(countData = cts, colData = coldata, design = ~ dex + timeStep + dex:timeStep) and then dds <- DESeq(dds ,test="LRT", reduced = ~ dex + timeStep)

My questions/concerns are: 1. Am I am using correct design Matrix for such time series analysis? 2. Since I am having two replicates as time Period so if the Number of replicates is good for such study? ( I don't have any possibility of adding more replicates.

deseq2 • 1.2k views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

Thanks Michael,

For the same experiment, I have run for 4 different Cell line. Out of these 4 Cell line, I am able to get gene with padj cutoff for 2 cellline while other 2 cell line, I didn't get any gene to lower then padj cutoff. For this two celline, I got gene with pval criteria but not padj. So what would your suggestion for such cases?

Regards, Najeeb

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

I have no further suggestions. It is underpowered.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode
@mikelove
Last seen 9 days ago
United States

Yes, that's correct. You could also throw in batch into both full and reduced as an additive effect with no interactions with other coefficients. Having two replicates is not desirable for a number of reasons, including bare practicality that one replicate may be of poor quality. But you can see if you can find large effects with this study nevertheless.

ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

Hello,

I wanted to follow up on this with a clarification question.

I repeated a similar design above to find a list of genes that had a condition-specific effect at any given time.

From the Vignette posted, am I correct in understanding that by looking at the result name "strainmut.minute30", I am comparing strainmut.minute30 VS strainwt.minute30, or is there a different comparison being made? If so, if I were to want to compare strainmut vs strainwt at every time point, would I need to subset the data to compare those 2 specifically, or is there a clever way to set contrasts?

Also, would the superset of the list of DE genes at each time point for the comparison above be equivalent to the list of genes that had a condition-specific effect?

Lastly, I thought an interesting follow up might be to categorize the genes with species/condition specific differences by their behavior (e.g. those that are up-regulated, then down-regulated vs. wt, those that are up-regulated throughout all time points, etc.). I was considering clustering the genes' differences in mean counts (generated from plotCounts). Would there be another suggested way within DESeq2?

Thank you so much.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Would you mind making a new post -- it's just easier for threaded content. And feel free to post any particular code or images you need.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Hello,

The new post has been made here.

Thanks!

ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 518 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6