Profile Posts Awards
Show
all questions tools blogs news tutorials forum answers comments
Showing : comments
0
votes
0
replies
864
views
Comment: Comment: Normalizing exonic reads and then log transforming or variance stabilising
2.3 years ago A ▴ 40
0
votes
0
replies
1.5k
views
Comment: Comment: Can VST be run without runing DESeq or estimateSizeFactors
2.6 years ago A ▴ 40
0
votes
2
replies
1.4k
views
Comment: Comment: Variance stabilising transformation to within given range
3.2 years ago A ▴ 40
0
votes
1
reply
1.4k
views
Comment: Comment: Variance stabilising transformation to within given range
3.2 years ago A ▴ 40
0
votes
0
replies
1.4k
views
Comment: Comment: Variance stabilising transformation to within given range
3.2 years ago A ▴ 40
0
votes
1
reply
1.4k
views
Comment: Comment: Variance stabilising transformation to within given range
3.2 years ago A ▴ 40
0
votes
0
replies
996
views
Comment: C: technical replicates and normalization/log transformation
3.6 years ago A ▴ 40
0
votes
1
reply
996
views
Comment: C: technical replicates and normalization/log transformation
3.6 years ago A ▴ 40
0
votes
0
replies
1.3k
views
Comment: C: subsetting VST counts from one dataset
4.0 years ago A ▴ 40
0
votes
0
replies
1.9k
views
Comment: C: Batch effects between different sequencing runs
4.6 years ago A ▴ 40
0
votes
0
replies
1.9k
views
Comment: C: Batch effects between different sequencing runs
4.6 years ago A ▴ 40
0
votes
0
replies
2.3k
views
Comment: C: Extracting VST matrix with batch effects removed
4.6 years ago A ▴ 40
0
votes
1
reply
2.3k
views
Comment: C: Extracting VST matrix with batch effects removed
4.6 years ago A ▴ 40
0
votes
1
reply
2.3k
views
Comment: C: Extracting VST matrix with batch effects removed
4.6 years ago A ▴ 40
0
votes
0
replies
634
views
Comment: C: Creating a similarity matrix for genes and not values
5.2 years ago A ▴ 40
0
votes
0
replies
1.4k
views
Comment: C: Results table completely wrong for specified contrast of
5.3 years ago A ▴ 40
0
votes
1
reply
1.4k
views
Comment: C: Results table completely wrong for specified contrast of
updated 5.3 years ago by 25k • written 5.3 years ago by ▴ 40
0
votes
1
reply
1.4k
views
Comment: C: Results table completely wrong for specified contrast of
5.3 years ago A ▴ 40
0
votes
0
replies
1.3k
views
Comment: C: RSubread in cygwin
5.3 years ago A ▴ 40
0
votes
0
replies
2.6k
views
Comment: C: mapping FASTQ files to single gene (fluorescent reporter)
5.4 years ago A ▴ 40
0
votes
1
reply
2.6k
views
Comment: C: mapping FASTQ files to single gene (fluorescent reporter)
5.4 years ago A ▴ 40
0
votes
0
replies
2.6k
views
Comment: C: mapping FASTQ files to single gene (fluorescent reporter)
5.4 years ago A ▴ 40
0
votes
0
replies
1.2k
views
Comment: C: Can DEXSeq ouput be used directly as an input for IsoformSwitchAnalyzeR
5.4 years ago A ▴ 40
0
votes
1
reply
1.2k
views
Comment: C: Can DEXSeq ouput be used directly as an input for IsoformSwitchAnalyzeR
5.4 years ago A ▴ 40
0
votes
1
reply
2.6k
views
Comment: C: mapping FASTQ files to single gene (fluorescent reporter)
5.4 years ago A ▴ 40
0
votes
1
reply
2.6k
views
Comment: C: mapping FASTQ files to single gene (fluorescent reporter)
5.4 years ago A ▴ 40
0
votes
1
reply
2.6k
views
Comment: C: mapping FASTQ files to single gene (fluorescent reporter)
5.4 years ago A ▴ 40
0
votes
1
reply
2.6k
views
Comment: C: mapping FASTQ files to single gene (fluorescent reporter)
5.4 years ago A ▴ 40
0
votes
0
replies
2.9k
views
Comment: C: Featurecounts issue for counting exons: Not matching total counts mapped for spe
5.4 years ago A ▴ 40
0
votes
1
reply
2.9k
views
Comment: C: Featurecounts issue for counting exons: Not matching total counts mapped for spe
5.4 years ago A ▴ 40
0
votes
0
replies
972
views
Comment: C: Preparation of summarizedExperiment for dexSeq
5.5 years ago A ▴ 40
0
votes
0
replies
750
views
Comment: C: Duplication of same sample as if two different samples
5.6 years ago A ▴ 40
0
votes
0
replies
750
views
Comment: C: Duplication of same sample as if two different samples
5.6 years ago A ▴ 40
0
votes
1
reply
750
views
Comment: C: Duplication of same sample as if two different samples
5.6 years ago A ▴ 40
0
votes
1
reply
750
views
Comment: C: Duplication of same sample as if two different samples
5.6 years ago A ▴ 40
0
votes
0
replies
1.5k
views
Comment: C: venDiagram after limma showing more genes after specifying up or down regulated
5.8 years ago A ▴ 40
0
votes
1
reply
1.5k
views
Comment: C: venDiagram after limma showing more genes after specifying up or down regulated
5.8 years ago A ▴ 40
0
votes
0
replies
1.3k
views
Comment: C: DEXSeq time course design
5.9 years ago A ▴ 40
0
votes
1
reply
1.3k
views
Comment: C: DEXSeq time course design
5.9 years ago A ▴ 40
0
votes
1
reply
1.3k
views
Comment: C: DEXSeq time course design
5.9 years ago A ▴ 40
0
votes
1
reply
1.0k
views
Comment: C: Results counts post DESeq same raw counts
6.0 years ago A ▴ 40
0
votes
0
replies
897
views
Comment: C: Interpretation of results names after LRT
6.2 years ago A ▴ 40
0
votes
1
reply
1.2k
views
Comment: C: Error in DESeq "object" not found
6.2 years ago A ▴ 40
0
votes
0
replies
1.2k
views
Comment: C: Filtering genes with a minimum number of counts between samples
6.2 years ago A ▴ 40
0
votes
0
replies
1.4k
views
Comment: C: Filtering for genes >100 counts after LRT still showing significant genes with g
6.2 years ago A ▴ 40
0
votes
1
reply
1.4k
views
Comment: C: Filtering for genes >100 counts after LRT still showing significant genes with g
6.2 years ago A ▴ 40
0
votes
1
reply
1.4k
views
Comment: C: Filtering for genes >100 counts after LRT still showing significant genes with g
6.2 years ago A ▴ 40
0
votes
1
reply
1.4k
views
Comment: A: Filtering for genes >100 counts after LRT still showing significant genes with g
6.2 years ago A ▴ 40
0
votes
0
replies
3.2k
views
Comment: C: DESeq2 nbinomLRT results interpretation
6.2 years ago A ▴ 40
0
votes
1
reply
3.2k
views
Comment: C: DESeq2 nbinomLRT results interpretation
6.2 years ago A ▴ 40
61 results • Page 1 of 2
Content Search
Users
Tags
Badges
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6