Log In
Sign Up
about
faq
Ask a question
Latest
News
Jobs
Tutorials
Tags
Users
New Post
Latest
News
Jobs
Tutorials
Tags
Users
Log In
Sign Up
About
Profile
Posts
Awards
Show
all
questions
tools
blogs
news
tutorials
forum
answers
comments
0
votes
0
replies
1.1k
views
Comment:
C: Validity of duplicateCorrelation after ComBat in this scenario
4.8 years ago
vizio12341337
• 0
1
vote
2
replies
1.1k
views
Validity of duplicateCorrelation after ComBat in this scenario
limma
ComBat
SVA
updated 4.8 years ago by
Gordon Smyth
51k • written 4.8 years ago by
vizio12341337
• 0
0
votes
0
replies
1.3k
views
Comment:
C: Validity of using DESeq2 with directly normalized EDASeq counts rather than offs
4.9 years ago
vizio12341337
• 0
0
votes
1
reply
1.3k
views
Comment:
C: Validity of using DESeq2 with directly normalized EDASeq counts rather than offs
4.9 years ago
vizio12341337
• 0
0
votes
1
reply
1.3k
views
Comment:
C: Validity of using DESeq2 with directly normalized EDASeq counts rather than offs
4.9 years ago
vizio12341337
• 0
1
vote
6
replies
1.3k
views
Validity of using DESeq2 with directly normalized EDASeq counts rather than offset
deseq2
edaseq
updated 4.9 years ago by
Michael Love
42k • written 4.9 years ago by
vizio12341337
• 0
6 results • Page
1 of 1
Content
Search
Users
Tags
Badges
Help
About
FAQ
Access
RSS
API
Stats
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our
User Agreement and Privacy Policy
.
Powered by the
version 2.3.6