Module membership vs gene significance does not correlate (WGCNA)
1
0
Entering edit mode
neber • 0
@neber-20225
Last seen 3.4 years ago

Hi,

I am using WGCNA to identify the modules with co-expressed genes and assign these modules to traits.

When I generate a labeled heatmap (please see the code below) to check the module-trait correlation, I see some modules correlating with some traits. However, when I check the module membership vs. gene significance for the correlating modules and traits from the heatmap, there is no correlation (please see an example of the code I used below).

Could someone please explain the reason for getting different results? How should I interpret this result?

Thanks!

The code I used for the labeled heatmap:

labeledHeatmap(Matrix = moduleTraitCor,
               #xLabels = names(datTraits),
               xLabels = cond,
               #yLabels = names(MEs),
               yLabels =namey,
               #ySymbols = names(MEs),
               ySymbols = namey,
               colorLabels = FALSE,
               colors = blueWhiteRed(50),
               textMatrix = textMatrix, 
               setStdMargins = FALSE,
               cex.text = 0.9,
               zlim = c(-1,1))

The code I used for the module membership (MM) vs. gene significance (GS) plot creation:

verboseScatterplot(abs(geneModuleMembership[moduleGenes, column]),
                   abs(geneTraitSignificance[moduleGenes, 1]),
                   xlab = paste("Module Membership in", module, "module"),
                   ylab = "Gene significance for fat",
                   main = paste("Module membership vs. gene significance\n"),
                   cex.main = 1.2, cex.lab = 1.2, cex.axis = 1.2, col = module)
wgcna module membership gene significance • 1.3k views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
@peter-langfelder-4469
Last seen 6 months ago
United States

First, make sure that it's not a trivial mistake of plotting a different module or trait than the combination that has a high correlation. If that has been checked, lack of GS-MM correlation could indicate that only a submodule relates to the trait. In that case, perhaps redoing the analysis with a finer module splitting could help. Overall, no GS-MM correlation to me suggests to consider the association more tentative, needing further validation or evidence.

ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 549 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6