Question: Module membership vs gene significance does not correlate (WGCNA)
0
gravatar for neber
4 weeks ago by
neber0
neber0 wrote:

Hi,

I am using WGCNA to identify the modules with co-expressed genes and assign these modules to traits.

When I generate a labeled heatmap (please see the code below) to check the module-trait correlation, I see some modules correlating with some traits. However, when I check the module membership vs. gene significance for the correlating modules and traits from the heatmap, there is no correlation (please see an example of the code I used below).

Could someone please explain the reason for getting different results? How should I interpret this result?

Thanks!

The code I used for the labeled heatmap:

labeledHeatmap(Matrix = moduleTraitCor,
               #xLabels = names(datTraits),
               xLabels = cond,
               #yLabels = names(MEs),
               yLabels =namey,
               #ySymbols = names(MEs),
               ySymbols = namey,
               colorLabels = FALSE,
               colors = blueWhiteRed(50),
               textMatrix = textMatrix, 
               setStdMargins = FALSE,
               cex.text = 0.9,
               zlim = c(-1,1))

The code I used for the module membership (MM) vs. gene significance (GS) plot creation:

verboseScatterplot(abs(geneModuleMembership[moduleGenes, column]),
                   abs(geneTraitSignificance[moduleGenes, 1]),
                   xlab = paste("Module Membership in", module, "module"),
                   ylab = "Gene significance for fat",
                   main = paste("Module membership vs. gene significance\n"),
                   cex.main = 1.2, cex.lab = 1.2, cex.axis = 1.2, col = module)
ADD COMMENTlink modified 4 weeks ago by Peter Langfelder1.8k • written 4 weeks ago by neber0
Answer: Module membership vs gene significance does not correlate (WGCNA)
0
gravatar for Peter Langfelder
4 weeks ago by
United States
Peter Langfelder1.8k wrote:

First, make sure that it's not a trivial mistake of plotting a different module or trait than the combination that has a high correlation. If that has been checked, lack of GS-MM correlation could indicate that only a submodule relates to the trait. In that case, perhaps redoing the analysis with a finer module splitting could help. Overall, no GS-MM correlation to me suggests to consider the association more tentative, needing further validation or evidence.

ADD COMMENTlink written 4 weeks ago by Peter Langfelder1.8k
Please log in to add an answer.

Help
Access

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 16.09
Traffic: 152 users visited in the last hour