deseq2 for enrichments between different subcellular fractions?
1
0
Entering edit mode
@mikelirastor-23380
Last seen 4.0 years ago

Hi,

I am trying to study the enrichment of transcripts at different subcellular fractions in E. coli. I collected three biological replicates, and for each replicate, I have the following samples:

SampleA: total RNA. SampleB: RNA isolated from specific fractions obtained by resolving sample A in sucrose gradients. SampleC: RNA obtained by pulling down an RNA binding protein of interest from sample B.

Briefly, in order to quantify the relative enrichment of each transcript within samples B and C, I plan to compare the transcriptomes of these samples to the total RNA by running deseq2 of sampleB vs sampleA and sampleC vs sampleA. The log2 fold-change would indicate the relative enrichment of each gene in samples B and C in relation to sampleA. Would you agree with this?

Furthermore, I am interested in comparing the enrichment of transcripts in sampleB vs those in sampleC. Specifically, I am interested in identifying transcripts that are underrepresented in sampleC in relation to sampleB. Considering that these two samples are not different experimental timepoints or conditions but different fractions, would running deseq2 of sampleB vs sampleC be suitable for this comparison? If not, could anyone suggest an alternative approach to tackle this second task?

Thanks.

Mikel

deseq2 galaxy • 488 views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
@mikelove
Last seen 3 hours ago
United States

This has been asked a few times before on the support forum, but I can imagine it's difficult to search for the same question. The crux is this:

(C - A) - (B - A) = C - B

There is no point including the A samples if they are the same for C and for B. It reduces to simply C - B.

ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 562 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6