Question: Upgrade to 3.6 - can't seem to get past Bioconductor 3.5
1
gravatar for barb.bryant
20 months ago by
barb.bryant10
barb.bryant10 wrote:

I want to upgrade to Bioconductor 3.6. I followed the instructions to upgrade R (I have 3.4.2), and source("https://bioconductor.org/biocLite.R"). However, it shows 3.5 still. Running biocLite() does not change this. 

I tried removing the biocInstaller package as was suggested by some, but that did not get me to 3.6

sessionInfo()
R version 3.4.2 (2017-09-28)
Platform: x86_64-w64-mingw32/x64 (64-bit)
Running under: Windows 10 x64 (build 15063)

Matrix products: default

locale:
[1] LC_COLLATE=English_United States.1252
[2] LC_CTYPE=English_United States.1252
[3] LC_MONETARY=English_United States.1252
[4] LC_NUMERIC=C
[5] LC_TIME=English_United States.1252

attached base packages:
[1] stats     graphics  grDevices utils     datasets  methods   base

other attached packages:
[1] BiocInstaller_1.26.1

loaded via a namespace (and not attached):
[1] compiler_3.4.2 tools_3.4.2
>

bioclite bioconductor • 712 views
ADD COMMENTlink modified 20 months ago by shepherl ♦♦ 1.4k • written 20 months ago by barb.bryant10
Answer: Upgrade to 3.6 - can't seem to get past Bioconductor 3.5
0
gravatar for shepherl
20 months ago by
shepherl ♦♦ 1.4k
United States
shepherl ♦♦ 1.4k wrote:

We are sorry for the confusion we were still in the process of updating the functions for release Bioc 3.6.  Please try again and let us know if you are still having trouble. 

ADD COMMENTlink written 20 months ago by shepherl ♦♦ 1.4k

It's still not working correctly.

ADD REPLYlink modified 20 months ago • written 20 months ago by Gordon Smyth37k

Can you provide some more detail?

ADD REPLYlink written 20 months ago by Martin Morgan ♦♦ 23k
1

My mistake -- now fine.

ADD REPLYlink written 20 months ago by Gordon Smyth37k

Users of R-devel / bioc-devel will experience issues for the next hour or so; windows users of R-devel will need to install from source for the next day or so (at least some CRAN windows binaries seem to be built with R-3.4.2 instead of R-devel).

ADD REPLYlink written 20 months ago by Martin Morgan ♦♦ 23k
Please log in to add an answer.

Help
Access

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 16.09
Traffic: 181 users visited in the last hour