Question: PCA analysis with 2 biological replicates
gravatar for bsad
6 months ago by
bsad0 wrote:


I'm really new to PCA analysis and just trying to understand how it works and the underlying stats. My problem is that when I run it for all my 3 biological replicates (3 Controls and 3 treatment) all 3 controls seem to correlate well but one of the "treatment" samples is really far off the other 2 (which correlate well with each other). So, I decided to try and re-run it after removing the replicate with the outlier "treatment" sample. This time I get my "treatment" samples correlating well (as they did in the first place) BUT the 2 controls are now far from each other! I'm confused as to why/how this is happening. I thought maybe because I only use 2 replicates that changes the balance between variations, but I'd really appreciate any ideas!!

Thanks so much for your time!!


bayseq pca • 184 views
ADD COMMENTlink written 6 months ago by bsad0

Please read my answer on Biostars:

By the way: you should really consider adding your PCA bi-plot figures to your post, and showing the explained variation along each axis. For one, "far off" is not a term that is quantifiable. It may visually look distant, but, mathematically / statistically, the distance may be virtually meaningless if the explained variation along the axis is only a couple of %

If you perform PCA on 2 samples, they will always appear distant from each other, appearing on opposite sides of the plot. That is the nature of PCA. It does not, however, necessarily imply that the 2 samples exhibit large-scale differences.

ADD REPLYlink modified 6 months ago • written 6 months ago by Kevin Blighe200
Please log in to add an answer.


Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 16.09
Traffic: 166 users visited in the last hour