Report and compare log2FC vs FC
2
1
Entering edit mode
@catalina-aguilar-hurtado-6554
Last seen 4.0 years ago
United States

Hi Michael,

I will like your opinion on reporting FC or log2FC. I use Deseq2 but other people I work with use other programs and report their data in FC so I usually convert my data to FC.

res$FC <- logratio2foldchange(res$log2FoldChange, base=2) 

Is there any reason why we should use one or the other? or is just a matter of personal likes?

Thanks

Catalina

 

deseq2 logfc • 23k views
ADD COMMENT
2
Entering edit mode
@ryan-c-thompson-5618
Last seen 4 weeks ago
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai…

I personally prefer log2 fold change, because of the symmetry: +1 is twofold up, and -1 is twofold down, etc. But many biologists are not comfortable thinking in log space and prefer just fold changes. Either way, it's the same information.

If you want to report non-log fold changes but still preserve the symmetry, you can convert "2" to "2-fold up" and "0.5" to "2-fold down".

ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

Hi Ryan thanks for your reply. Don't really understand how to preserve the symmetry, what do you mean by 2-fold up or down?

ADD REPLY
1
Entering edit mode

I mean that "2-fold up" and "2-fold down" are conceptually of equal magnitude (i.e. symmetric), But their corresponding fold changes, 2 and 0.5, are not, while their corresponding log2 fold changes, +1 and -1, are.

ADD REPLY
1
Entering edit mode
smoorthie ▴ 10
@smoorthie-7531
Last seen 9.6 years ago

If you are going to plot the data (as opposed to just quoting values) then I think Ryan's argument about symmetry is even stronger. Plotted naively a 100-fold up-regulated gene looks like a much bigger effect than a 0.01-fold down-regulated gene. Of course then the answer (if you have to quote fold changes rather than log2 fc) is simply to plot with a log-scale.

ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 584 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6