Log In
Sign Up
about
faq
Ask a question
Latest
News
Jobs
Tutorials
Tags
Users
New Post
Latest
News
Jobs
Tutorials
Tags
Users
Log In
Sign Up
About
Limit
all time
today
this week
this month
this year
Unanswered
All posts
Sort
Update
Answers
Bookmarks
Creation
Replies
Rank
Views
Votes
Showing :
MoleculeExperiment
•
reset
0
votes
0
replies
895
views
Job:
Postdoc+PhD position: Spatial & Single-Cell Computational Immunogenomics for Cancer Diagnosis
JobPosting
CuratedAtlasQueryR
MoleculeExperiment
SingleCellExperiment
SpatialExperiment
14 months ago
Stefano Mangiola
▴ 40
0
votes
0
replies
500
views
News:
Interested in the analysis of Spatial Omics data?
tidySpatialExperiment
SpatialExperiment
MoleculeExperiment
16 months ago
info
▴ 10
0
votes
3
replies
952
views
DESeq with multiple condition
MoleculeExperiment
DifferentialExpression
DESeq2
updated 20 months ago by
ATpoint
★ 4.9k • written 20 months ago by
michelafrancesconi8
• 0
0
votes
1
reply
668
views
Missing genes in the differentially expressed gene list which otherwise are expected to show expression post treatment.
MoleculeExperiment
updated 24 months ago by
ATpoint
★ 4.9k • written 24 months ago by
irenekokosaikia
• 0
4 results • Page
1 of 1
Recent ...
Replies
Comment: ROAST compare results with complex design
by
Gordon Smyth
52k
It's also worth pointing out that the syntax for `camera` and `mroast` is the same, so I wonder how OP did the earlier `camera` analysis.
Answer: ROAST compare results with complex design
by
James W. MacDonald
68k
You are specifying that the last column of your design should be used as the contrast. You should instead use `contrast[,1]`, which will us…
Comment: How to account for solvent controls in DESeq2 when comparing follicular vs lutea
by
James W. MacDonald
68k
Yes. You can infer that by figuring out what each coefficient measures. Here is your design matrix: ``` > targets ID Name phase G…
Comment: How to account for solvent controls in DESeq2 when comparing follicular vs lutea
by
snijesh
▴ 200
I would like to clarify whether the command `res <- results(dds, name = "phaseLP.conditionTreated")` is the correct approach to generate …
Comment: How to account for solvent controls in DESeq2 when comparing follicular vs lutea
by
James W. MacDonald
68k
Not sure I understand. You ask how to do something and then show how one would do so.
Votes
Answer: ROAST compare results with complex design
How to account for solvent controls in DESeq2 when comparing follicular vs luteal phase?
Answer: How to account for solvent controls in DESeq2 when comparing follicular vs lutea
Answer: How to account for solvent controls in DESeq2 when comparing follicular vs lutea
Comment: Using DESeq2 on single cell RNA Seq data of same cell type but different conditi
Awards
• All
Popular Question
to
Gordon Smyth
52k
Popular Question
to
boczniak767
▴ 740
Popular Question
to
Young Tae
• 0
Popular Question
to
Robert Castelo
★ 3.4k
Popular Question
to
littlefishes20
▴ 10
Locations
• All
WEHI, Melbourne, Australia,
2 hours ago
United States,
3 hours ago
Poland,
4 hours ago
United States,
5 hours ago
The city by the bay,
5 hours ago
Traffic: 646 users visited in the last hour
Content
Search
Users
Tags
Badges
Help
About
FAQ
Access
RSS
API
Stats
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our
User Agreement and Privacy Policy
.
Powered by the
version 2.3.6