updated 9 months ago by
Malcolm Cook
★
1.6k
•
written 9 months ago by
Nebat
•
0
0
votes
2
replies
875
views
0
votes
7
replies
683
views
updated 11 weeks ago by
danalvoronov
▴
10
•
written 5 months ago by
jfmay
•
0
0
votes
0
replies
267
views
0
votes
0
replies
426
views
updated 7 months ago by
James W. MacDonald
65k
•
written 7 months ago by
sophie.hfliu
•
0
0
votes
1
reply
327
views
0
votes
2
replies
1.2k
views
0
votes
0
replies
109
views
0
votes
4
replies
263
views
0
votes
0
replies
280
views
1
vote
3
replies
1.6k
views
updated 5 months ago by
dineika.chandrananda
•
0
•
written 2.0 years ago by
zgraytho88
•
0
Recent ...
Replies
Comment: Numerical differences in DESeq2 output depending on different design matrix cons
by
JKim
•
0
The 1st model has an interaction term, but the 2nd model doesn't have the interaction term. That makes the difference.
Comment: Ensembl plants at annotationHub?
by
Daniele
•
0
Hi,
I'm using Ensembl Plants release 59 with the IWGSC RefSeq v1.1 gene annotation.
Thanks a lot for replying so quickly!
Comment: Numerical differences in DESeq2 output depending on different design matrix cons
by
swbarnes2
★
1.4k
If you restrict yourself to, say, genes with a baseMean > 50, are the numerical differences between the two designs significant?
Comment: DESeq2- Mysterious interaction suppresses DEGs
by
shaunpeterson
•
0
The images I tried to attach didn't attach. Here is the PCA (MDS) of all the samples, with the Cortex outlier highlighed.
WEHI, Melbourne, Australia, 12 minutes ago
Poland, 36 minutes ago
United States, 43 minutes ago
India, 59 minutes ago
The city by the bay, 1 hour ago
WEHI, Melbourne, Australia, 12 minutes ago
Poland, 36 minutes ago
United States, 43 minutes ago
India, 59 minutes ago
The city by the bay, 1 hour ago
Traffic: 523 users visited in the last hour
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by the
version 2.3.6
version 2.3.6