updated 11 months ago by
Ling-Hsiu
▴
10
•
written 15 months ago by
julieta.micorriza
•
0
3
votes
5
replies
1.7k
views
0
votes
2
replies
907
views
written 4.0 years ago by
joannew
•
0
0
votes
2
replies
103
views
0
votes
0
replies
151
views
0
votes
3
replies
748
views
updated 10 months ago by
Erik Wright
▴
150
•
written 10 months ago by
Till
▴
30
Recent ...
Replies
Answer: Numerical differences in DESeq2 output depending on different design matrix cons
by
Michael Love
42k
Yes there can be small numerical differences in the estimated quantities because of how the algorithms decide to stop iterating.
Answer: DESeq2- Mysterious interaction suppresses DEGs
by
Michael Love
42k
Removing samples from one group nevertheless changes the variance estimation (dispersion) for all comparisons. So you could have pushed one…
Comment: Ensembl plants at annotationHub?
by
Daniele
•
0
Hi,
I'm using Ensembl Plants release 59 with the IWGSC RefSeq v1.1 gene annotation.
Thanks a lot for replying so quickly!
Comment: Numerical differences in DESeq2 output depending on different design matrix cons
by
swbarnes2
★
1.4k
If you restrict yourself to, say, genes with a baseMean > 50, are the numerical differences between the two designs significant?
Comment: DESeq2- Mysterious interaction suppresses DEGs
by
shaunpeterson
•
0
The images I tried to attach didn't attach. Here is the PCA (MDS) of all the samples, with the Cortex outlier highlighed.
Sweden, 10 minutes ago
United States, 21 minutes ago
UPF, Barcelona, Spain, 21 minutes ago
United States, 42 minutes ago
Ireland, 1 hour ago
Sweden, 10 minutes ago
United States, 21 minutes ago
UPF, Barcelona, Spain, 21 minutes ago
United States, 42 minutes ago
Ireland, 1 hour ago
Traffic: 327 users visited in the last hour
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by the
version 2.3.6
version 2.3.6