updated 8.9 years ago by
Valerie Obenchain
★
6.8k
•
written 8.9 years ago by
Peter Hickey
▴
750
0
votes
2
replies
1.5k
views
1
vote
1
reply
1.2k
views
updated 9.4 years ago by
Martin Morgan
25k
•
written 9.4 years ago by
gokcen.eraslan
▴
10
Recent ...
Replies
Answer: Log2foldchange strange behavior
by
ATpoint
★
4.8k
The `results()` output you show is perfectly in line with the oputput of `plotCounts()`, hence it is not a DESeq2 issue. UBE3A is higher in…
Comment: DeSeq Strategies for run to run Replication
by
i.c.denhond
•
0
Dear Michael,
could you please comment on how to properly apply a vst transformation to a new dataset (in this case, left-out samples)? I …
Comment: Log2foldchange strange behavior
by
RambakKulit
•
0
Okay, I'm attaching those now. Just to provide a bit more context for the results below: I downloaded both count and TPM data from the GTEx…
Comment: Log2foldchange strange behavior
by
ATpoint
★
4.8k
This cannot be answered here like this. Your results tables are not direct DESeq2 output, maybe it's a merging error during generation of t…
Comment: RE:proper pooling design
by
bicecac533
•
0
I look forward to reading more articles like this! [Stickman Boost][1]
[1]: https://stickmanboost.com
Awards
• All
Popular Question to
Chris
▴
20
Popular Question to
aguirre
▴
20
Popular Question to
Robert Castelo
★
3.4k
Scholar to
Gordon Smyth
52k
Locations
• All
United States, 1 minute ago
United States, 31 minutes ago
United States, 39 minutes ago
United States, 46 minutes ago
Switzerland, 1 hour ago
United States, 1 minute ago
United States, 31 minutes ago
United States, 39 minutes ago
United States, 46 minutes ago
Switzerland, 1 hour ago
Traffic: 670 users visited in the last hour
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by the
version 2.3.6
version 2.3.6