11 weeks ago • updated 24 days ago
shepherl
3.9k
0
votes
7
replies
746
views
3
votes
18
replies
3.0k
views
10 months ago • updated 4 weeks ago
shepherl
3.9k
0
votes
4
replies
769
views
0
votes
3
replies
554
views
0
votes
2
replies
904
views
13 months ago • updated 11 months ago
shepherl
3.9k
0
votes
2
replies
542
views
12 months ago • updated 11 months ago
Franck RICHARD
•
0
Recent ...
Replies
Comment: Numerical differences in DESeq2 output depending on different design matrix cons
by
JKim
•
0
The 1st model has an interaction term, but the 2nd model doesn't have the interaction term. That makes the difference.
Comment: Ensembl plants at annotationHub?
by
Daniele
•
0
Hi,
I'm using Ensembl Plants release 59 with the IWGSC RefSeq v1.1 gene annotation.
Thanks a lot for replying so quickly!
Comment: Numerical differences in DESeq2 output depending on different design matrix cons
by
swbarnes2
★
1.4k
If you restrict yourself to, say, genes with a baseMean > 50, are the numerical differences between the two designs significant?
Comment: DESeq2- Mysterious interaction suppresses DEGs
by
shaunpeterson
•
0
The images I tried to attach didn't attach. Here is the PCA (MDS) of all the samples, with the Cortex outlier highlighed.
India, 30 minutes ago
Greece, 50 minutes ago
WEHI, Melbourne, Australia, 1 hour ago
Poland, 1 hour ago
United States, 1 hour ago
India, 30 minutes ago
Greece, 50 minutes ago
WEHI, Melbourne, Australia, 1 hour ago
Poland, 1 hour ago
United States, 1 hour ago
Traffic: 434 users visited in the last hour
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by the
version 2.3.6
version 2.3.6