updated 6.9 years ago by
anusha.nagari
▴
50
•
written 6.9 years ago by
Deleted
▴
70
5
votes
3
replies
1.4k
views
3
votes
2
replies
1.6k
views
Recent ...
Replies
Comment: How to account for solvent controls in DESeq2 when comparing follicular vs lutea
by
James W. MacDonald
68k
Yes. You can infer that by figuring out what each coefficient measures. Here is your design matrix:
```
> targets
ID Name phase G…
Comment: How to account for solvent controls in DESeq2 when comparing follicular vs lutea
by
snijesh
▴
200
I would like to clarify whether the command
`res <- results(dds, name = "phaseLP.conditionTreated")`
is the correct approach to generate …
Comment: How to account for solvent controls in DESeq2 when comparing follicular vs lutea
by
James W. MacDonald
68k
Not sure I understand. You ask how to do something and then show how one would do so.
Comment: DiffBind getting Fold values of near 0
by
littlefishes20
▴
10
Same issues. All peaks return to a fold near 0, although they are significant when visualizing in IGV. Please find the MAplot and volcanoPl…
Comment: How to account for solvent controls in DESeq2 when comparing follicular vs lutea
by
snijesh
▴
200
I have checked DEGs between Solvent Control (SC) of FP and LP and there are noticebale differences in terms of DEGs.
```
# Checking SC in …
Votes
Awards
• All
Popular Question to
Gordon Smyth
52k
Popular Question to
boczniak767
▴
740
Popular Question to
Young Tae
•
0
Popular Question to
Robert Castelo
★
3.4k
Popular Question to
littlefishes20
▴
10
Locations
• All
Germany, 24 minutes ago
United States, 24 minutes ago
Pittsburgh, United States, 1 hour ago
WEHI, Melbourne, Australia, 1 hour ago
United States, 1 hour ago
Germany, 24 minutes ago
United States, 24 minutes ago
Pittsburgh, United States, 1 hour ago
WEHI, Melbourne, Australia, 1 hour ago
United States, 1 hour ago
Traffic: 804 users visited in the last hour
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by the
version 2.3.6
version 2.3.6