Bioconductor Medips

Showing : medips • reset

7

votes

18

replies

3.0k

views

illimina 450k methylation qsea MEDIPS TCGA

updated 4 months ago by Matthias Lienhard ▴ 240 • written 7.1 years ago by justinburgener ▴ 20

0

votes

0

replies

300

views

MEDIPS CpG

7 months ago greta • 0

0

votes

1

reply

282

views

MEDIPS

updated 6 months ago by James W. MacDonald 65k • written 6 months ago by James • 0

0

votes

0

replies

148

views

ngsReports MEDIPS

7 weeks ago subhiksha • 0

4 results • Page 1 of 1

Recent ...

Replies

Comment: Too many significant genes when integrating gtex and tcga by ATpoint ★ 4.1k

These two datasets are from completely different experiments / batches. It is utterly meaningless to compare them. I would suggest comparat…

Answer: fgsea significant result by ATpoint ★ 4.1k

Set a fixed seed before running this. Note that a FDR of 0.25 in fgsea is wildly and overly lenient. See https://support.bioconductor.o…

Answer: How to use bootRanges to bootstrap small RNA loci (nullranges package) by Poonam • 0

Hi Michael, I think there is something wrong with the generation of nullranges. I was working with small RNA and methylation overlaps. …

Answer: Once again a "Model matrix not full rank" by swbarnes2 ★ 1.3k

Replicate numbers, like the 1 in control_1 are fine in sample names, but never add them to anything else in colData. From the computer's p…

Answer: limma Intercept vs No-intercept models completely changing DMR results? by Gordon Smyth 50k

I'll add a little bit of general advice to James' answer. You seem to have the misunderstanding that you can change the design matrix but …

Votes

Answer: Why does GSEA on edgeR results for randomized samples give highly significant p-

Answer: limma Intercept vs No-intercept models completely changing DMR results?

Answer: CombineArrays for EPIC and EPIC V2

Answer: Too many significant genes when integrating gtex and tcga

Comment: Too many significant genes when integrating gtex and tcga

Awards • All