0
votes
0
replies
4
views
0
votes
0
replies
10
views
30 minutes ago
pickingastar
•
0
0
votes
0
replies
19
views
5 hours ago • updated 50 minutes ago
Abiologist
•
0
0
votes
1
reply
54
views
20 hours ago • updated 19 hours ago
shaunpeterson
•
0
0
votes
3
replies
82
views
updated 21 hours ago by
damian.szk
▴
80
•
written 23 hours ago by
ninidea
•
0
0
votes
2
replies
144
views
7
votes
39
replies
5.7k
views
updated 14 hours ago by
Daniele
•
0
•
written 5.5 years ago by
Guido Hooiveld
★
4.0k
0
votes
3
replies
2.1k
views
updated 21 hours ago by
anne-laure
•
0
•
written 7.9 years ago by
ls299
•
0
Recent ...
Replies
Comment: Numerical differences in DESeq2 output depending on different design matrix cons
by
JKim
•
0
The 1st model has an interaction term, but the 2nd model doesn't have the interaction term. That makes the difference.
Comment: Ensembl plants at annotationHub?
by
Daniele
•
0
Hi,
I'm using Ensembl Plants release 59 with the IWGSC RefSeq v1.1 gene annotation.
Thanks a lot for replying so quickly!
Comment: Numerical differences in DESeq2 output depending on different design matrix cons
by
swbarnes2
★
1.4k
If you restrict yourself to, say, genes with a baseMean > 50, are the numerical differences between the two designs significant?
Comment: DESeq2- Mysterious interaction suppresses DEGs
by
shaunpeterson
•
0
The images I tried to attach didn't attach. Here is the PCA (MDS) of all the samples, with the Cortex outlier highlighed.
Hong Kong, just now
Hong Kong, 18 minutes ago
Poland, 50 minutes ago
Greece, 1 hour ago
WEHI, Melbourne, Australia, 1 hour ago
Hong Kong, just now
Hong Kong, 18 minutes ago
Poland, 50 minutes ago
Greece, 1 hour ago
WEHI, Melbourne, Australia, 1 hour ago
Traffic: 438 users visited in the last hour
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by the
version 2.3.6
version 2.3.6