Log In
Sign Up
about
faq
Ask a question
Latest
News
Jobs
Tutorials
Tags
Users
New Post
Latest
News
Jobs
Tutorials
Tags
Users
Log In
Sign Up
About
Limit
all time
today
this week
this month
this year
Unanswered
All posts
Sort
Update
Answers
Bookmarks
Creation
Replies
Rank
Views
Votes
Showing :
resultsnames
•
reset
0
votes
8
replies
1.8k
views
DESeq2 coefficient names
resultsNames
DESeq2
coefficient
3.0 years ago
Jane
▴ 10
1
vote
7
replies
9.0k
views
DESeq2 resultsNames(dds) not giving the right comparisons?.
deseq2
DESeq2
resultsNames
6.8 years ago
davichen
▴ 10
0
votes
5
replies
707
views
Unexpected results
resultsNames
DESeq2
written 3.3 years ago by
efratsh
▴ 10
0
votes
4
replies
3.3k
views
DESeq2 extracting results: resultsNames does not show the expected output
deseq2
rnaseq
resultsnames
7.0 years ago
zeynep.nenseth
• 0
2
votes
4
replies
4.0k
views
DESeq results names when using interaction terms
DESeq
deseq2
resultsnames
7.9 years ago • updated 7.8 years ago
akaever
▴ 30
4
votes
4
replies
2.1k
views
How to handle the change in resultsNames() for DESeq2 ?
deseq2
resultsnames
multifactorial design
updated 7.9 years ago by
Michael Love
41k • written 7.9 years ago by
Ira
▴ 10
0
votes
3
replies
911
views
Pairwise comparisons for "both between and within subject"experiment using DESeq2
pairwise
deseq2
extracting contrasts
resultsnames
results deseq2
updated 5.4 years ago by
Michael Love
41k • written 5.4 years ago by
Ricardo Rodrigues
• 0
1
vote
3
replies
1.0k
views
resultsNames(dds) not showing all contrasts
DESeq2
resultsNames
lfcShrink
updated 20 months ago by
ATpoint
★ 4.1k • written 20 months ago by
eve.olszanowski
• 0
0
votes
2
replies
1.1k
views
Discrepancy in extracting contrasts
deseq2
resultsnames
batch effect
contrast
updated 6.6 years ago by
Michael Love
41k • written 6.6 years ago by
pkachroo
▴ 10
0
votes
1
reply
1.2k
views
resultnames(dds) not giving correct output
deseq2
resultsnames
updated 6.8 years ago by
Michael Love
41k • written 6.8 years ago by
mrigaya.mehra
▴ 10
0
votes
1
reply
2.9k
views
DESeq2 releveling not changing resultsNames options
deseq2
relevel
resultsNames
multifactorial design
updated 8.2 years ago by
Michael Love
41k • written 8.2 years ago by
rclaire
▴ 20
11 results • Page
1 of 1
Recent ...
Replies
Comment: Why does GSEA on edgeR results for randomized samples give highly significant p-
by
Chris
• 0
Intent to delete when going home. Sorry for that!
Comment: Why does GSEA on edgeR results for randomized samples give highly significant p-
by
Gordon Smyth
50k
Please ask you own question. Inserting your own dataset into someone else's question like this is very impolite. I have already answered m…
Comment: package goseq seems to be not available on the latest version of R
by
Gordon Smyth
50k
limma most certainly is available. It installs in R 4.4.0 and Bioc 3.19 for all platforms without any issues. It has not had any period of …
Comment: package goseq seems to be not available on the latest version of R
by
Patrycja
▴ 20
limma package also isn't available.Is there any information when these packages will be available?
Comment: Why does GSEA on edgeR results for randomized samples give highly significant p-
by
Chris
• 0
Thanks Gordon for the advice!
Votes
Comment: Why does GSEA on edgeR results for randomized samples give highly significant p-
Answer: Why does GSEA on edgeR results for randomized samples give highly significant p-
Handling multiple differential expression comparisons
Answer: fgsea significant result
Answer: fgsea significant result
Awards
• All
Scholar
to
ATpoint
★ 4.1k
Popular Question
to
Ben
▴ 50
Popular Question
to
Sam
▴ 10
Popular Question
to
Gordon Smyth
50k
Popular Question
to
Zainab
▴ 10
Locations
• All
Melbourne, Australia,
7 minutes ago
France,
8 minutes ago
United States,
20 minutes ago
United States,
23 minutes ago
European Union,
34 minutes ago
Traffic: 500 users visited in the last hour
Content
Search
Users
Tags
Badges
Help
About
FAQ
Access
RSS
API
Stats
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our
User Agreement and Privacy Policy
.
Powered by the
version 2.3.6