updated 7.2 years ago by
Gordon Smyth
51k
•
written 7.2 years ago by
Sanches
•
0
1
vote
2
replies
1.3k
views
1
vote
2
replies
2.5k
views
updated 7.7 years ago by
Aaron Lun
★
28k
•
written 7.7 years ago by
danielle.newby
•
0
5
votes
10
replies
4.8k
views
updated 8.5 years ago by
Gordon Smyth
51k
•
written 8.5 years ago by
svlachavas
▴
830
12
votes
9
replies
8.6k
views
9.7 years ago
svlachavas
▴
830
Recent ...
Replies
Comment: ANOVA like approach of edgeR
by
Yunshun Chen
▴
870
If you do it this way, the dispersion estimates would be much higher than they should (as the cell type difference is not accounted for in …
Comment: ANOVA like approach of edgeR
by
SamGG
▴
350
Simply remove the cell type from the model.
design <- model.matrix(~targets$Status)
Answer: ANOVA like approach of edgeR
by
Yunshun Chen
▴
870
You could try the followings:
> design <- model.matrix(~ 0 + group)
> contrast <- makeContrasts(PvsL = 0.5*(L.pregnant + B.pregnan…
Answer: Identical samples after deseq2 batch effect removal
by
maripane
•
0
Thanks Michael, so is there a way to work around this issue?
Can I somehow make sure I can remove this batch effects without overcorrecti…
Comment: CleanUpRNAseq with a GTF that is missing mitochondria annotation data
by
rcreed
•
0
The updated version worked well on my data. Thank you!
Votes
Awards
• All
Locations
• All
Germany, 8 minutes ago
France, 9 minutes ago
United Kingdom, 14 minutes ago
Algeria, 52 minutes ago
The Netherlands, 1 hour ago
Germany, 8 minutes ago
France, 9 minutes ago
United Kingdom, 14 minutes ago
Algeria, 52 minutes ago
The Netherlands, 1 hour ago
Traffic: 738 users visited in the last hour
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by the
version 2.3.6
version 2.3.6