17 days ago • updated 4 days ago
mat149
▴
70
3
votes
4
replies
274
views
2
votes
6
replies
796
views
updated 7 months ago by
Hervé Pagès
16k
•
written 7 months ago by
nromerov
•
0
2
votes
2
replies
259
views
7 weeks ago
ramiro.barrantes
▴
10
1
vote
3
replies
553
views
updated 8 months ago by
James W. MacDonald
65k
•
written 8 months ago by
rogerb
•
0
1
vote
5
replies
458
views
10 weeks ago • updated 8 weeks ago
Gerhard Thallinger
▴
180
0
votes
2
replies
721
views
0
votes
5
replies
2.9k
views
8.2 years ago • updated 12 days ago
Henrik Bengtsson
★
2.4k
0
votes
1
reply
159
views
updated 7 weeks ago by
James W. MacDonald
65k
•
written 7 weeks ago by
Karen
•
0
0
votes
0
replies
175
views
Recent ...
Replies
Answer: Numerical differences in DESeq2 output depending on different design matrix cons
by
Michael Love
42k
Yes there can be small numerical differences in the estimated quantities because of how the algorithms decide to stop iterating.
Answer: DESeq2- Mysterious interaction suppresses DEGs
by
Michael Love
42k
Removing samples from one group nevertheless changes the variance estimation (dispersion) for all comparisons. So you could have pushed one…
Comment: Ensembl plants at annotationHub?
by
Daniele
•
0
Hi,
I'm using Ensembl Plants release 59 with the IWGSC RefSeq v1.1 gene annotation.
Thanks a lot for replying so quickly!
Comment: Numerical differences in DESeq2 output depending on different design matrix cons
by
swbarnes2
★
1.4k
If you restrict yourself to, say, genes with a baseMean > 50, are the numerical differences between the two designs significant?
Comment: DESeq2- Mysterious interaction suppresses DEGs
by
shaunpeterson
•
0
The images I tried to attach didn't attach. Here is the PCA (MDS) of all the samples, with the Cortex outlier highlighed.
Sweden, 10 minutes ago
United States, 21 minutes ago
UPF, Barcelona, Spain, 21 minutes ago
United States, 42 minutes ago
Ireland, 1 hour ago
Sweden, 10 minutes ago
United States, 21 minutes ago
UPF, Barcelona, Spain, 21 minutes ago
United States, 42 minutes ago
Ireland, 1 hour ago
Traffic: 335 users visited in the last hour
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by the
version 2.3.6
version 2.3.6