0
votes
2
replies
1.2k
views
0
votes
1
reply
1.2k
views
0
votes
1
reply
1.1k
views
1
vote
3
replies
1.3k
views
1
vote
0
replies
878
views
2
votes
3
replies
1.4k
views
0
votes
1
reply
896
views
0
votes
0
replies
957
views
6.2 years ago
shepherl
3.9k
0
votes
0
replies
892
views
6.2 years ago
shepherl
3.9k
0
votes
1
reply
1.0k
views
6.3 years ago
shepherl
3.9k
0
votes
0
replies
1.1k
views
6.4 years ago
shepherl
3.9k
0
votes
2
replies
1.0k
views
updated 6.5 years ago by
flipdiving2017
•
0
•
written 6.5 years ago by
shepherl
3.9k
0
votes
0
replies
950
views
6.6 years ago
shepherl
3.9k
0
votes
1
reply
1.2k
views
0
votes
0
replies
1.3k
views
6.8 years ago
shepherl
3.9k
Recent ...
Replies
Comment: Ensembl plants at annotationHub?
by
Daniele
•
0
Hi,
I'm using Ensembl Plants release 59 with the IWGSC RefSeq v1.1 gene annotation.
Thanks a lot for replying so quickly!
Comment: Numerical differences in DESeq2 output depending on different design matrix cons
by
swbarnes2
★
1.4k
If you restrict yourself to, say, genes with a baseMean > 50, are the numerical differences between the two designs significant?
Comment: DESeq2- Mysterious interaction suppresses DEGs
by
shaunpeterson
•
0
The images I tried to attach didn't attach. Here is the PCA (MDS) of all the samples, with the Cortex outlier highlighed.
WEHI, Melbourne, Australia, 23 minutes ago
United States, 43 minutes ago
United States, 47 minutes ago
San Diego, 56 minutes ago
Sweden, 1 hour ago
WEHI, Melbourne, Australia, 23 minutes ago
United States, 43 minutes ago
United States, 47 minutes ago
San Diego, 56 minutes ago
Sweden, 1 hour ago
Traffic: 722 users visited in the last hour
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by the
version 2.3.6
version 2.3.6