9 days ago • updated 6 days ago
sajadahmad41454
•
0
2
votes
7
replies
358
views
0
votes
3
replies
151
views
0
votes
3
replies
70
views
updated 11 hours ago by
damian.szk
▴
80
•
written 14 hours ago by
ninidea
•
0
1
vote
2
replies
223
views
4 days ago • updated 1 day ago
BioinfGuru
▴
30
0
votes
2
replies
84
views
4 days ago • updated 3 days ago
Yveto
•
0
0
votes
1
reply
68
views
0
votes
1
reply
59
views
0
votes
1
reply
39
views
10 hours ago • updated 9 hours ago
shaunpeterson
•
0
0
votes
0
replies
55
views
1 day ago
Anton01
•
0
0
votes
0
replies
13
views
1 day ago
oliverelijhan
0
0
votes
0
replies
41
views
1 day ago
Shaimaa Gamal
•
0
0
votes
0
replies
42
views
1 day ago
Ειρήνη
•
0
0
votes
0
replies
32
views
0
votes
0
replies
27
views
0
votes
0
replies
29
views
0
votes
0
replies
46
views
0
votes
0
replies
33
views
Recent ...
Replies
Comment: Ensembl plants at annotationHub?
by
Daniele
•
0
Hi,
I'm using Ensembl Plants release 59 with the IWGSC RefSeq v1.1 gene annotation.
Thanks a lot for replying so quickly!
Comment: Numerical differences in DESeq2 output depending on different design matrix cons
by
swbarnes2
★
1.4k
If you restrict yourself to, say, genes with a baseMean > 50, are the numerical differences between the two designs significant?
Comment: DESeq2- Mysterious interaction suppresses DEGs
by
shaunpeterson
•
0
The images I tried to attach didn't attach. Here is the PCA (MDS) of all the samples, with the Cortex outlier highlighed.
Poland, 2 minutes ago
The city by the bay, 8 minutes ago
Melbourne, Australia, 53 minutes ago
Ireland, 57 minutes ago
WEHI, Melbourne, Australia, 1 hour ago
Poland, 2 minutes ago
The city by the bay, 8 minutes ago
Melbourne, Australia, 53 minutes ago
Ireland, 57 minutes ago
WEHI, Melbourne, Australia, 1 hour ago
Traffic: 562 users visited in the last hour
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by the
version 2.3.6
version 2.3.6