5.6 years ago
Matthew Thornton
▴
380
1
vote
2
replies
1.5k
views
1
vote
5
replies
1.4k
views
0
votes
2
replies
1.5k
views
updated 6.1 years ago by
shepherl
4.1k
•
written 6.1 years ago by
Tim Triche
★
4.2k
3
votes
1
reply
2.3k
views
6.6 years ago
Alejandro Reyes
★
1.9k
6
votes
3
replies
2.9k
views
updated 7.1 years ago by
Lluís Revilla Sancho
▴
760
•
written 7.1 years ago by
Paul Brennan
▴
10
0
votes
0
replies
2.4k
views
7.3 years ago
Bohdan Khomtchouk
▴
10
3
votes
2
replies
1.3k
views
updated 7.6 years ago by
Martin Morgan
25k
•
written 7.6 years ago by
mlbendall
•
0
2
votes
8
replies
4.0k
views
updated 8.5 years ago by
Michael Lawrence
★
11k
•
written 8.5 years ago by
Peter Hickey
▴
740
1
vote
3
replies
1.8k
views
updated 9.0 years ago by
Dan Tenenbaum
★
8.2k
•
written 9.0 years ago by
MarcinKosiński
•
0
3
votes
6
replies
2.4k
views
updated 9.5 years ago by
Dan Tenenbaum
★
8.2k
•
written 9.5 years ago by
Nathan Sheffield
▴
10
5
votes
3
replies
1.8k
views
0
votes
2
replies
2.3k
views
9.7 years ago
mjsduncan
•
0
0
votes
1
reply
2.1k
views
updated 10.1 years ago by
Martin Morgan
25k
•
written 10.1 years ago by
Tiphaine Martin
▴
40
1
vote
1
reply
1.8k
views
updated 10.1 years ago by
Martin Morgan
25k
•
written 10.1 years ago by
Tiphaine Martin
▴
40
Recent ...
Replies
Comment: ANOVA like approach of edgeR
by
Yunshun Chen
▴
870
If you do it this way, the dispersion estimates would be much higher than they should (as the cell type difference is not accounted for in …
Comment: ANOVA like approach of edgeR
by
SamGG
▴
350
Simply remove the cell type from the model.
design <- model.matrix(~targets$Status)
Answer: ANOVA like approach of edgeR
by
Yunshun Chen
▴
870
You could try the followings:
> design <- model.matrix(~ 0 + group)
> contrast <- makeContrasts(PvsL = 0.5*(L.pregnant + B.pregnan…
Answer: Identical samples after deseq2 batch effect removal
by
maripane
•
0
Thanks Michael, so is there a way to work around this issue?
Can I somehow make sure I can remove this batch effects without overcorrecti…
Comment: CleanUpRNAseq with a GTF that is missing mitochondria annotation data
by
rcreed
•
0
The updated version worked well on my data. Thank you!
Votes
Awards
• All
Locations
• All
United Kingdom, 1 minute ago
WEHI, Melbourne, Australia, 2 minutes ago
Austria, 4 minutes ago
EMBL Heidelberg, 9 minutes ago
Australia, 10 minutes ago
United Kingdom, 1 minute ago
WEHI, Melbourne, Australia, 2 minutes ago
Austria, 4 minutes ago
EMBL Heidelberg, 9 minutes ago
Australia, 10 minutes ago
Traffic: 835 users visited in the last hour
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by the
version 2.3.6
version 2.3.6