4 weeks ago • updated 25 days ago
hortense96
•
0
0
votes
7
replies
362
views
1
vote
1
reply
341
views
updated 12 weeks ago by
James W. MacDonald
65k
•
written 12 weeks ago by
david.cheishvili
•
0
1
vote
4
replies
504
views
5
votes
1
reply
1.4k
views
2
votes
4
replies
680
views
updated 5 months ago by
Gordon Smyth
50k
•
written 5 months ago by
kyj2226
•
0
3
votes
6
replies
716
views
6 months ago
aldea85
•
0
2
votes
7
replies
2.5k
views
updated 7 months ago by
dorota.komar
•
0
•
written 3.4 years ago by
Ankit
▴
20
0
votes
1
reply
763
views
updated 7 months ago by
James W. MacDonald
65k
•
written 7 months ago by
henry-keen
•
0
1
vote
3
replies
542
views
updated 9 months ago by
James W. MacDonald
65k
•
written 9 months ago by
hayleyw
•
0
0
votes
1
reply
2.5k
views
updated 9 months ago by
ATpoint
★
4.1k
•
written 9 months ago by
rae.alshammari
▴
10
0
votes
3
replies
2.8k
views
updated 9 months ago by
olatunbosun.arowolo
•
0
•
written 19 months ago by
shuangshuang
•
0
1
vote
2
replies
608
views
10 months ago
Krzysztof
•
0
1
vote
2
replies
673
views
0
votes
2
replies
1.0k
views
13 months ago • updated 12 months ago
arisarkar88
▴
40
1
vote
1
reply
577
views
updated 12 months ago by
belinda.phipson
▴
40
•
written 12 months ago by
Grace
•
0
2
votes
6
replies
1.1k
views
updated 12 months ago by
Tim Peters
▴
180
•
written 12 months ago by
Grace
•
0
0
votes
1
reply
559
views
updated 13 months ago by
Gordon Smyth
50k
•
written 13 months ago by
Grace
•
0
0
votes
1
reply
628
views
updated 14 months ago by
James W. MacDonald
65k
•
written 14 months ago by
edward.esiribloom
•
0
0
votes
5
replies
1.2k
views
written 14 months ago by
Grace
•
0
0
votes
4
replies
1.0k
views
updated 14 months ago by
James W. MacDonald
65k
•
written 14 months ago by
Grace
•
0
0
votes
1
reply
683
views
written 17 months ago by
Jenny Drnevich
★
2.0k
0
votes
7
replies
2.7k
views
updated 19 months ago by
James W. MacDonald
65k
•
written 2.0 years ago by
16301050225
•
0
0
votes
0
replies
740
views
0
votes
0
replies
954
views
2.3 years ago
zusman
•
0
2
votes
4
replies
1.3k
views
0
votes
6
replies
3.4k
views
2.8 years ago
FWNL15
•
0
0
votes
2
replies
970
views
3.1 years ago
Kesava
•
0
0
votes
2
replies
1.4k
views
1
vote
8
replies
1.4k
views
3.1 years ago
chay
•
0
0
votes
2
replies
883
views
3.3 years ago
sissialva21
•
0
1
vote
1
reply
1.2k
views
updated 3.6 years ago by
James W. MacDonald
65k
•
written 3.6 years ago by
Julie
•
0
Recent ...
Replies
Answer: Numerical differences in DESeq2 output depending on different design matrix cons
by
Michael Love
42k
Yes there can be small numerical differences in the estimated quantities because of how the algorithms decide to stop iterating.
Answer: DESeq2- Mysterious interaction suppresses DEGs
by
Michael Love
42k
Removing samples from one group nevertheless changes the variance estimation (dispersion) for all comparisons. So you could have pushed one…
Comment: Ensembl plants at annotationHub?
by
Daniele
•
0
Hi,
I'm using Ensembl Plants release 59 with the IWGSC RefSeq v1.1 gene annotation.
Thanks a lot for replying so quickly!
Comment: Numerical differences in DESeq2 output depending on different design matrix cons
by
swbarnes2
★
1.4k
If you restrict yourself to, say, genes with a baseMean > 50, are the numerical differences between the two designs significant?
Comment: DESeq2- Mysterious interaction suppresses DEGs
by
shaunpeterson
•
0
The images I tried to attach didn't attach. Here is the PCA (MDS) of all the samples, with the Cortex outlier highlighed.
The city by the bay, 6 minutes ago
UPF, Barcelona, Spain, 8 minutes ago
United States, 58 minutes ago
Sweden, 1 hour ago
EMBL Heidelberg, 1 hour ago
The city by the bay, 6 minutes ago
UPF, Barcelona, Spain, 8 minutes ago
United States, 58 minutes ago
Sweden, 1 hour ago
EMBL Heidelberg, 1 hour ago
Traffic: 387 users visited in the last hour
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by the
version 2.3.6
version 2.3.6