9.3 years ago
Patrick Schorderet
▴
20
4
votes
7
replies
15k
views
1
vote
11
replies
2.1k
views
0
votes
4
replies
1.5k
views
0
votes
2
replies
2.0k
views
3
votes
3
replies
1.3k
views
updated 3.8 years ago by
Laurent Gatto
1.6k
•
written 4.0 years ago by
sreedta8
▴
10
0
votes
2
replies
1.3k
views
6.5 years ago
shepherl
3.9k
2
votes
1
reply
2.7k
views
updated 8.5 years ago by
Martin Morgan
25k
•
written 8.5 years ago by
av
•
0
2
votes
7
replies
1.3k
views
updated 9.2 years ago by
Dan Tenenbaum
★
8.2k
•
written 9.2 years ago by
levk
•
0
2
votes
4
replies
2.4k
views
1
vote
5
replies
3.0k
views
updated 4.0 years ago by
Kevin Blighe
★
3.9k
•
written 4.0 years ago by
bs14ab
•
0
3
votes
6
replies
2.2k
views
updated 8.2 years ago by
Sushant Pawar
•
0
•
written 8.2 years ago by
nathan.watsonhaigh
•
0
3
votes
3
replies
1.5k
views
updated 7.2 years ago by
b.nota
▴
360
•
written 7.2 years ago by
Maximilian
▴
10
0
votes
1
reply
1.1k
views
2
votes
2
replies
1.3k
views
2
votes
1
reply
1.0k
views
updated 5.7 years ago by
Michael Lawrence
★
11k
•
written 5.7 years ago by
lukaszbednarz
▴
10
0
votes
1
reply
1.9k
views
updated 5.3 years ago by
Gordon Smyth
50k
•
written 5.3 years ago by
thkapell
▴
10
0
votes
1
reply
1.8k
views
updated 4.9 years ago by
Martin Morgan
25k
•
written 4.9 years ago by
get3232
•
0
0
votes
1
reply
1.1k
views
updated 4.7 years ago by
Mike Smith
★
6.5k
•
written 4.7 years ago by
kodherif
•
0
0
votes
2
replies
1.3k
views
updated 4.3 years ago by
James W. MacDonald
65k
•
written 4.3 years ago by
alex
•
0
1
vote
1
reply
870
views
updated 3.9 years ago by
James W. MacDonald
65k
•
written 3.9 years ago by
yassiflower
•
0
0
votes
1
reply
669
views
updated 3.0 years ago by
Lluís Revilla Sancho
▴
730
•
written 3.0 years ago by
curiousmind007
▴
10
1
vote
6
replies
2.2k
views
updated 2.2 years ago by
Marcel Ramos
700
•
written 2.2 years ago by
jose
▴
10
0
votes
1
reply
1.2k
views
5
votes
1
reply
464
views
written 6 months ago by
shepherl
3.9k
0
votes
2
replies
600
views
updated 15 months ago by
Marcel Ramos
700
•
written 15 months ago by
dab0012
•
0
2
votes
2
replies
1.0k
views
8
votes
0
replies
881
views
2.1 years ago • updated 2.0 years ago
shepherl
3.9k
1
vote
0
replies
785
views
3
votes
4
replies
1.5k
views
4
votes
0
replies
827
views
0
votes
0
replies
1.6k
views
1
vote
0
replies
864
views
0
votes
4
replies
2.2k
views
updated 3.9 years ago by
Kevin Blighe
★
3.9k
•
written 3.9 years ago by
443606623
•
0
0
votes
3
replies
1.3k
views
updated 3.8 years ago by
James W. MacDonald
65k
•
written 3.8 years ago by
bs14ab
•
0
0
votes
0
replies
999
views
4
votes
0
replies
954
views
0
votes
2
replies
1.1k
views
4
votes
0
replies
667
views
1
vote
0
replies
809
views
18 months ago
shepherl
3.9k
12
votes
5
replies
1.9k
views
News:
DOI for packages
4
votes
0
replies
142
views
17 days ago
shepherl
3.9k
1
vote
2
replies
2.4k
views
0
votes
0
replies
820
views
2.8 years ago
shepherl
3.9k
0
votes
0
replies
1.5k
views
8.2 years ago
Martin Morgan
25k
1
vote
1
reply
993
views
6.1 years ago
shepherl
3.9k
0
votes
0
replies
610
views
12 months ago
shepherl
3.9k
8
votes
0
replies
906
views
1
vote
0
replies
840
views
0
votes
1
reply
4.7k
views
1
vote
4
replies
1.5k
views
Recent ...
Replies
Answer: Numerical differences in DESeq2 output depending on different design matrix cons
by
Michael Love
42k
Yes there can be small numerical differences in the estimated quantities because of how the algorithms decide to stop iterating.
Answer: DESeq2- Mysterious interaction suppresses DEGs
by
Michael Love
42k
Removing samples from one group nevertheless changes the variance estimation (dispersion) for all comparisons. So you could have pushed one…
Comment: Ensembl plants at annotationHub?
by
Daniele
•
0
Hi,
I'm using Ensembl Plants release 59 with the IWGSC RefSeq v1.1 gene annotation.
Thanks a lot for replying so quickly!
Comment: Numerical differences in DESeq2 output depending on different design matrix cons
by
swbarnes2
★
1.4k
If you restrict yourself to, say, genes with a baseMean > 50, are the numerical differences between the two designs significant?
Comment: DESeq2- Mysterious interaction suppresses DEGs
by
shaunpeterson
•
0
The images I tried to attach didn't attach. Here is the PCA (MDS) of all the samples, with the Cortex outlier highlighed.
EMBL Heidelberg, 39 minutes ago
Sweden, 41 minutes ago
WEHI, Melbourne, Australia, 58 minutes ago
The city by the bay, 1 hour ago
UPF, Barcelona, Spain, 1 hour ago
EMBL Heidelberg, 39 minutes ago
Sweden, 41 minutes ago
WEHI, Melbourne, Australia, 58 minutes ago
The city by the bay, 1 hour ago
UPF, Barcelona, Spain, 1 hour ago
Traffic: 338 users visited in the last hour
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by the
version 2.3.6
version 2.3.6